ADDED NOTE: Jay has been a WeAreChangeLA member for a couple of years. Great job Jay!
From: Jay Blaq @ JoomlaXTC <n.j3337@gmail.com>
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano is the only man on FOX that tells the truth about the constitution, the federal reserve, the IRS and the banksters, but what about 911? During the Save America Convention on Friday March 18th the Judge gave a fiery speech to about 1,000 people. After the speech, the Judge fielded questions many about the UN and a take over of America, these were less popular to judicial questions, but one question stood out from them all - 911!
A lone 911 Truth Advocate asked a simple question and was given no response other than “Pass” - what most public figures do - pass the buck, but the surprise comes to the applause for the question and the single clap for the Judge’s answer! Judge Andrew Napolitano like many others in the Political spotlight still fail to give their personal view about 911 for fear of job security or some unknown reason. It is safe to say that the Judge does question the story or he would have made it clear that 911 was not an inside job and there is no reason to question the official story.
Please check out the video and get involved with asking questions yourself. One down - many to go! Special Thanks to Bruno from WeAreChangeLA for giving me the power and the desire to ask so many questions.
They can’t shake the 9-11 Truth movement. Must be so annoying for the powers that be. Persistence is powerful. Thanks for being there to remind them that we are not going anywhere brother!
In Part 1, Jeremy asks Kerrey about the fact that Al Qaeda couldn’t have brought down the buildings on Ground Zero with high tech explosives. So who is the real threat? Kerrey’s response? “I was there that morning, I saw two planes fly into them.” Katy Kurtzman hands Bob Kerrey the peer-reviewed paper that proves high-tech explosives were used in the destruction of the three WTC towers on 9-11-01 in NYC.
What about building 7? “That building was full of fuel… that question has been examined by the 9-11 Commission.”
“If in New York City, that thing had been blown up, believe me, the people of New York would know and would be angry about it.”
“We’ve been identified by these organizations as the number one enemy… as the ‘head of the snake’ as Bin Laden has described us… We’ve got to go to Afghanistan because that’s where Bin Laden and Al Qaeda are… When it comes to National Security, public opinion can be dangerous.” - Bob Kerrey
In Part 2, Bruno reminds Kerrey that all the current torture, loss of freedoms, and deaths around the world lead back to Ground Zero on 9-11. The pressure mounts, so Kerrey begins to back track and make excuses for the 9-11 Commission.
> In Part 3, Dan Noel who is also an engineer member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth hands Bob Kerrey a card of information directing him to the proof of controlled demolition of the three WTC towers http://www.ae911truth.org. Paul Wittenberger asks Kerrey about Building 7. Jeremy confronts Kerrey about the aspects of treason involved with covering up the truth about 9-11, and Kerrey responds “It’s a 30 year conspiracy”.
——-
On October 14, 2009, Thomas C. Reed, who was a nuclear weapons designer, Secretary of the Air Force during the Ford and Carter administrations and the 6th director of the National Reconnaissance Office, was at the University of Southern California to give a lecture based on his book entitled “The Nuclear Express and the Prevention of Nuclear Terror.” After giving an international history of the development of nuclear weapons and describing some of the political forces that shaped many countries’ decisions to pursue nuclear weapons, Reed turned to focus on the potential threat of nuclear terrorism in the current day and age.
Reed, while showing charts showing the likely destruction patterns of different size nuclear weapons detonated in Los Angeles, made the assertion that “there is a significant danger of a nuclear event in the West soon…during this President’s term of office…”
During the question and answer session, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel, asking the first question by presenting war-game and terror-drill data from the 9/11 operation, openly suggested that the threat of nuclear terrorism was more of an intrastitial, or coup d’etat-type, threat represented by the “apparent treason infecting the deep bowels of the National Security Apparatus.”
——————
TCR: Now the first lesson I want to impress upon you, especially you of the younger generation is there is a significant danger of a nuclear event in the West soon…during this President’s term of office…
Nuclear weapons are very serious things. In my career, I was involved with the Titan missile…
Titan carried a 10 megaton warhead…
A 10 megaton warhead detonated on City Hall in Los Angeles produces this result: The dark (more…)
We put a cover letter on a package of facts and scientific analyses regarding the controlled demolition of the WTC complex on September 11, 2001. The letter is here as follows, as well as the links to the scientific papers.
We the People, in order to restore rule of law and accountability to our Republic, respectfully insist that you, as an elected representative, squarely face the facts concerning the events of September 11, 2001 and the implications thereof.
It is our moral and civic duty to entrust to you facts and scientific analyses in the form of peer-reviewed, published scientific papers that clearly and conclusively prove thousands of our fellow human beings and citizens were murdered in controlled and criminal demolitions on September 11, 2001.
Plausible deniability of these facts and evidence is no longer possible.
If you fail to acknowledge and act immediately and decisively on this evidence, then your inaction will constitute misprision of treason in the least, outright treason at worst. The time is now to fulfill your oath to the Constitution and stand tall in the face of the corruption of our Republic. We the People stand with you.
Pursuant to U.S. Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115
§ 2381. Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
And § 2382. Misprision of Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
Comments Off
Persistence is powerful. Thanks for being there to remind them that we are not going anywhere brother!