REAGAN ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT TIE IN
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
Sirhan Sirhan the accused and legally convicted killer of Robert Kennedy filed legal documents in Federal Court in Los Angeles this week. His attorney, William F. Pepper, alleges that his client had been subjected to hypnosis and mind control and had been “handled” at the murder scene by an unidentified woman who helped stage the assassination.
Pepper’s filing include significant references to witness statements and forensic reports that were systematically suppressed during the investigation.
Pepper alleges that Sirhan Sirhan is innocent and that Kennedy was murdered as part of a conspiracy in which his client was involved as a “patsy” though use of hypnosis and other means.
Harvard University professor Daniel Brown, a noted expert in hypnosis and trauma memory loss, who interviewed Sirhan for over 60 hours, is believed to have “broken” Sirhan’s “programming.”
This is what was learned;
Sirhan was taken to the Ambassador Hotel by handlers. At some point, he was given a tap on his shoulder by the woman witnesses say ran from the building taking credit for the murder, the woman, for some reason forgotten by the investigation. Sirhan reported that he found himself at a pistol range, holding a gun he had never seen before. He heard firing, two shots rang out. He says he never fired the shots. Numerous witnesses support this.
As for Sirhan and the woman, interviews revealed that Sirhan had a deep sexual obsession her. What we are not told is how he came to know her. In fact, interviews tend to establish that Sirhan himself didn’t know how he came to know her or the basis for his strong feelings.Sirhan also has no conscious knowledge of visiting the pistol range that his reported “hypnotic delusion” placed him at during the Kennedy shooting.
An almost identical shooting occurred in 1981. John Hinckley Jr., shot President Ronald Reagan outside the Washington Hilton Hotel.
The reported reason was Hinckley’s “sexual obsession” with actress Jody Foster. The Sirhan Sirhan “sexual obsession” aspect of the Kennedy assassination was known to authorities and members of the press but no connection was ever made. It is being made now.
Are there other relevant facts that should have led to a further investigation?
- Hinckley, a Mormon, belonged to a family closely aligned with the Bush family. Then Vice President George H.W. Bush, was a former CIA Director and had been named by the Warren Report as a person of interest unless there was another “George Bush of Texas” that moved in CIA and political circles.
- Reports from close associations of President Reagan now tell of his total distrust of Bush and his deep resentment at having Bush on the ticket with him. Insiders report that Bush was “frozen out” of all White House and national security functions. Stories to the contrary, including those stating that Reagan showed an onset of Alzheimer’s as early as 1983 are said to be wildly inaccurate.
- “Reagan was ‘on his game’ and took personal charge of foreign police and security issues. He ordered that Bush be kept out of
everything. He didn’t trust him. “Lee Wanta.
- The 1968 murder of Martin Luther King, under close examination, seems equally spurious with reexaminations of the case and mock trials favoring the direct involvement of police and intelligence agencies in the killing.
When you add the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy into the mix, something emerges that is far more than a simple pattern. What you have is an epidemic of carefully conceived political killings with one theme that runs throughout, that of the “patsy.”
James Earl Ray, John Hinckley Jr., Sirhan Sirhan and Lee Harvey Oswald are more than just ‘unlikely’ killers. They were ideal candidates for “framing.”
KENNEDY, LOS ANGELES 1968
It was 1968 and Robert F. Kennedy was a shoo-in for president. He had just won the California primary and was at a party function at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles. Shots rang out, and Sirhan Sirhan was wrestled to the ground by footballer Rosy Grier. Sirhan, if we can call him by one name only, was not the shooter, this has been long established and easily proven even without heading into the area of conspiracy. The shooters were pursued out of the building, reportedly a woman screamed out, “We killed Kennedy!” as she ran out the rear exit.Police had an “all points bulletin” out for suspects, there were descriptions and witness statements, it was in the newspapers then, for some strange reason, as though the hand of G-d reached out, reality was erased and the manhunt was as though it had never happened.
Forensic evidence showed Kennedy was shot from behind and that Sirhan Sirhan could not have been the shooter. This has never been disputed.
Court documents allege what can only be described as “mind control.” Nothing attributed to the defense claim, as submitted by attorney William Pepper, who also represented James Early Ray, departs from the strict definition of “hypnosis,” though the CIA had spent millions on programs that strayed into that region, mind control and, in fact, well beyond. “Mind control” was considered pretty tame stuff compared to the “remote viewing” and “psycho-kinetic energy” studies that went on for over a decade.
The CIA became obsessed with mind control after prisoners of war held by the Chinese, Russians and North Koreans returned showing symptoms of something far beyond simple indoctrination. Some had been successfully programmed as deep cover agents. Because of the classification level of all documents and studies involving this threat, even to this day there is only fiction to draw upon, films such as the Manchurian Candidate and Telefon or the recent blockbuster video game, Call of Duty Black Ops (spoiler alert) which “alleges” Kennedy’s murder was directly tied to “mind control.”
Is “pop culture” bridging the gap between disinformation and reality?
REAGAN AND THE KENNEDY’S HAD ENEMIES…
There are several issues that may tie the 3 shootings together. Despite the conspiracy theories, reports from many directions indicate that all three men shared one powerful and very “third rail” belief. All wished to see an end to the privately owned banking system that they believed was pushing America into financial insolvency.All three, Reagan and the Kennedy’s had sought economic counsel regarding the dismemberment of the Federal Reserve System. All three shared this one belief, that the Federal Reserve represents a threat against American sovereignty and is an instrument of defacto foreign control of a vital element of American security, control of currency and debt.
Could there be a greater motive than this? In 1963, Kennedy had ordered the Treasury Department to prepare to issue non-Federal Reserve currency. That order was never carried out.
A second Bush president tripled America’s debt in a 5 year period. Was this what Reagan had foreseen also? This is what we are told, perhaps it may be time to “really” reassess Reagan also.
Filed Under * First Responders, 9-11 truth, 911 victims, CIA, Censorship, Controlled Demolition, David Ray Griffin, Firefighters for 911 Truth, Global Awakening, Independent Media, Mainstream Media, Mossad, New World Order, Operation Mockingbird | Comments Off
Kevin Barrett is a renowned American journalist, writer and former university lecturer. He has taught English, French, Arabic, American Civilization, Humanities, African Literature, Folklore, and Islam at colleges and universities in the San Francisco Bay area, Paris, and Madison, Wisconsin. Being a Muslim convert, Dr. Barrett is a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance (MUJCA) and member of the Scientific Panel for the Investigation of 9/11 (SPINE).
According to Salem News, In July 2004 he rashly rejected a plum post-doc at the University of California because it was funded by the 9/11-disinformation-sponsoring CIA-linked Ford Foundation. “In the summer of 2006, Republican state legislators and Fox newscasters demanded that Barrett be fired from his job teaching an introductory Islam class at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, but the University refused to buckle, and Barrett got high marks from his students.”In fall 2006 Barrett began hosting an Internet talk show weekly on Republic Broadcasting Network titled “Truth Jihad Radio.” Twice a week he had another Internet talk show on the Genesis Communications Network called “The Dynamic Duo.”
Dr. Barrett is internationally renowned for his well-substantiated researches on the 9/11 which he describes as a false-flag operation and inside job that took place with the foreknowledge of the high-ranking personalities inside the U.S. executive structure.
He wrote three articles for the Madison’s Capital Times newspaper in which he tried to reveal the truth behind the 9/11 attacks; however, the newspaper was shortly closed after running his articles.
Kevin Barrett kindly accepted my interview request and joined me in an in-depth conversation, answering my questions regarding the 9/11 attacks and the influence of Israeli lobby over the U.S. policymakers. What follows is the complete text of my interview with Dr. Kevin Barrett, journalist, writer and university lecturer.
Kourosh Ziabari: You have selected the title “Truth Jihad” for your personal website. Although being functionally and semantically a sublime and precious concept in Islamic thought, Jihad has been constantly vilified and denigrated by the extremist neo-cons and Zionists who want to portray a distorted and black image of Islam. They claim that Jihad is tantamount to terrorism and Muslims who follow the principle of Jihad are terrorists as well; however, the reality is that Jihad is a mobilized, logically sustained and concerted confrontation with those who want to plunder your values and treasures and violate your rights. Although you’re a Muslim convert, you are a Western citizen; however, you have selected an Islamic name for your website. Would you please explain about this selection for me and my readers?
Kevin Barrett: Being a Western citizen and a convert does not make me any less of a Muslim. Islam, after all is a deen, a religion and a way of life, not a race or ethnicity.
In any case, jihad is a noble religious concept. As you know, the word means “effort” or “striving.” In one sense, jihad is the complement of “Islam” whose root meaning is “surrender” to God. So jihad means to exert effort in the cause of God.
One very intense form of effort, exertion or striving in the cause of God is armed struggle in defense of the community. Those who wage this form of jihad risk everything in an all-out struggle in service to the community and to God.
Today, Islam as a deen, and the world Muslim community, is under attack. 9/11 was a mass human sacrifice designed to ritually inaugurate a New World Order of global government by satanists and atheists. With Christianity and the other big religions co-opted or neutered, only Islam stands between the perpetrators of 9/11 and their goal of a New World Order. Under these circumstances, is incumbent upon Muslims to wage effective jihad in self-defense and in defense of our religion, and in defense of all of our fellow human beings and our planet, fi sabili llah [in the way of God].
After thinking things through, I have concluded that the most effective way that I can wage jihad is by wielding the weapon of truth — especially the truth about 9/11. The 9/11 perpetrators seem to have made several big mistakes and left unmistakable evidence incriminating themselves. Their single biggest mistake, apparently, was failing to demolish World Trade Center Building 7 on the morning of 9/11; presumably due to some logistical problem, they had to wait to demolish it until late that afternoon. Anyone who spends a few minutes informing themselves about WTC-7 must either choose intellectual dishonesty, or admit that 9/11 was an inside job. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxmdYOorqs0
When Americans and Westerners face the fact that 9/11 was an inside job, their attitude toward Islam, and the New World Order’s war on Islam, changes radically. They realize that they, and Muslims, share a common enemy. They become deserters from the war on Islam, and join the oppressed peoples of the world, and the bearers of the scriptures, in a common struggle for justice.
While I am very serious about waging this “truth jihad,” I realize that Western culture fears and loathes the word “jihad.” So I use a technique common in certain forms of comic literature — for example, the novel Don Quixote — of being simultaneously serious and humorous. I make fun of myself by using hyperbole (exaggeration) in order to play the role of the “crazy radical jihadi for truth.” What is most hilarious, and most deeply serious, is that this “crazy radical jihadi” character I’m playing, like King Lear’s fool, is the only sane character in the play, the only one who understands and tells the whole, painful truth. The humor makes my uncompromisingly honest message palatable for Western audiences. As the saying goes, “If you tell the truth, make it funny or they’ll kill you.”
By accepting this role, which Allah’s qadr seems to have prepared for me, I am straddling the boundary between Islamic and Western culture, between seriousness and humor, between reality and imagination, in a unique way. As an American Muslim literary scholar with an odd Irish sense of humor, and a whole lot of outrage about 9/11 and the 9/11 wars, this is my way of waging jihad fi sabili llah.
KZ: What’s your precise stance on the 9/11 attacks? Do you believe that the U.S. officials had foreknowledge of the incident? Do you think that it was an inside job or a false flag operation? Have you traced any sign of the Israel’s involvement in the attacks?
KB: To know means to believe based on sufficient evidence. So I know, not just believe, that 9/11 was a false-flag attack, that many individuals at or near the top of the US Executive Branch, military, and intelligence apparatus were complicit in the attack, and that the state of Israel and its American agents were heavily involved. This is the inescapable conclusion of anyone who reads David Ray Griffin’s books on the subject, alongside Bollyn’s Solving 9/11, with an open mind.
KZ: Your publication “Bin Laden’s Dead, the Tape is Phony” is considered to be the first pro-9/110-truth op-ed ever written and published in a mainstream media outlet. You have written three such op-eds in “Capital Times” of Madison. Why don’t the mainstream media publish op-eds and articles revealing the truth of 9/11 attack? Why do they shun the publication of materials which are critical of the mainstream interpretation of the attacks?
KB: The American mainstream media are owned by just a few huge corporations, and thoroughly penetrated by the CIA. Google “Operation Mockingbird”. The owners and key decision-makers of these outlets are disproportionately Jewish and pro-Zionist (see Philip Weiss’s “Do Jews Dominate in American Media? And So What if We Do?”). Deep down inside, a great many of these Zionists suspect the truth about 9/11, and are terrified that if revealed it could trigger an anti-Jewish pogram and/or the destruction of Israel. Additionally, many Americans, Jewish and otherwise, who are not Zionists, feel threatened by the possibility that the truth about 9/11 would reveal them as fools, and perhaps even annihilate their whole world-view. It is difficult for journalists who are trained to believe that America is an exceptional nation, and that America’s leaders always have good intentions, to believe that their own leaders would conspire in the ritual slaughter of thousands of their own people. The few who are cynical enough to realize how evil their leaders are, are also cynical enough to know on which side their bread is buttered. Everyone in the media knows that breathing a word of truth about 9/11 will kill your career. It may not be coincidental that shortly after publishing my three 9/11 truth op-eds, the Capital Times was closed down by the company that owned it, leaving Madison with only one newspaper: The lying, corrupt Wisconsin State Journal.
KZ: In October 2004, the 9/11 hero William Rodriguez filed a lawsuit against the then President George W. Bush and 155 other parties and accused them of complicity in the 9/11 attacks. He claimed that the Twin Towers were devastated by means of “controlled demolitions” which the members of New York fire department were ordered on instructions of the CIA. Is it true that FDNY conspired with Larry Silverstein under the patronage of CIA to deliberately destroy the Twin Towers?
KB: The short answer is “yes.” But it should be noted that the NY Fire Department was not complicit as a whole department. Rather, its leadership is penetrated by the CIA and perhaps Mossad, in the same way that state governments, state and local police departments, the FBI and other agencies are penetrated by the CIA and other intelligence agencies. According to Jesse Ventura, upon his inauguration as Governor of Minnesota, a group of state government officials who were also undercover CIA officers summoned him to a briefing in which it was made clear who was really running the State of Minnesota. The FDNY is undoubtedly infiltrated as well. Larry Silverstein’s hesitation in mentioning the “er…Fire Department Commander” who decided to “pull” WTC-7 suggests that this “FDNY Commander” was actually a high level intelligence operative whose job may have included a cover position in FDNY.
KZ: Physicist Dr. Crockett Grabbe has pointed out in a 2007 article that the NIST account of the 9/11 attacks has been thoroughly erroneous, unrealistic and fallacious. He has pointed out that “the rapidly expanding huge concrete dust clouds from the towers, the very-quick appearance of multiple squibs on all 3 collapsing buildings, and the destruction of hundreds of autos for several blocks around the World Trade Center from these squibs” indicate that the Twin Towers did not simply collapse as a result of the planes crashing into the towers, but due to explosive materials. Jim Hoffman’s article also attests to the same fact and admits the presence of unignited aluminothermic explosives in dust samples from the Twin Towers, whose chemical signature matches previously documented aluminothermic residues found in the same dust samples. What does this fact signify? Who should be held accountable if we admit that the explosive materials brought down the Twin Towers?
KB: Everyone who is lying about it and who should know better — meaning the entire GW Bush Administration, the top levels of the military and intelligence command, all of the NIST people responsible for the scientific fraud represented by NIST’s reports on the WTC, and a great many others (see www.whodidit.org/) should be immediately arrested and aggressively interrogated, with relatively leniency offered in exchange for the whole truth delivered in a timely manner. If our judicial system cannot do this, citizens, including honest police and military, should arm themselves in preparation to make citizens arrests in what will amount to a second American revolution. Likewise, foreign nations ought to demand the truth about 9/11, and to cut off all relations with the USA until war crimes prosecutions reveal the full truth about 9/11 and the 9/11 wars.
KZ: You are a founding member of the Muslim-Jewish-Christina Alliance which is aimed at improving interfaith dialogue, coexistence and understanding in light of the 9/11 events. It’s a very fantastic goal to bring together the followers of divine religion and improve mutual understanding and peaceful coexistence between them; however, there are people who don’t tolerate this religious convergence and want to sow the seeds of incompatibility, dissention and strife between the Muslims, Jews and Christians. They are extremist and radical conservatives who follow the Marx’s viewpoint that religion is the “opium of masses”, hence downgrading interfaith dialogue and undermining it. How is it possible to realize an all-out, all-encompassing interfaith dialogue while the media moguls, hawkish statesmen and warmongering politicians want to bring about conflict and disagreement between the followers of divine religions?
KB: That is a very good question! I am disappointed at the slow progress of 9/11 truth in the Jewish and Christian communities, and by the failure of the global Muslim community to offer its full support to the 9/11 truth movement. The New World Order atheists and satanists have cleverly pitted the revealed religions against each other, while fostering an atmosphere of hopelessness and despondency that prevents many from taking action. Since Muslims by and large are better acquainted with the facts, both about 9/11, and about the brother- and sisterhood between good Read more
Filed Under 9-11 truth, Afghanistan, Anti-War, Building 7, Celebrities, Controlled Demolition, Evidence, False Flag, First Amendment, Global Awakening, Halliburton, History, JFK, Military Industrial Complex, YouTube | Comments Off
Filed Under Al Qaeda, Big Brother, CIA, Evidence, FBI, False Flag, Global Awakening, Independent Media, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Military Industrial Complex, Mossad, Police State, Propaganda | Comments Off
The Intel Hub
By Alex Thomas
February 16th, 2011
Just days after Al Hallor, San Diego assistant port director and an officer with Customs and Border Protection, admitted that weapons of “mass effect” had entered a port somewhere in the San Diego area, Dr. Vahid Majidi, the FBI’s assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate has stated that there is a 100% chance of a WMD attack in America.
Speaking to Newsmax, Dr. Majidi seemed eerily sure of an imminent attack in America.
“The notion of probability of a WMD attack being low or high is a moot point because we know the probability is 100 percent,” Majidi says. “We’ve seen this in the past, and we will see it in the future. There is going to be an attack using chemical, biological or radiological material.”
With documented evidence that Al Qaeda was created by western intelligence and that the FBI has literally given lone wolf terrorists multiple bombs, the idea that the assistant director in charge of the FBI’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Directorate is openly declaring a WMD attack will happen should raise alarms throughout America.
While Majidi did say terrorists would most likely employ chemical, biological, or radiological weapons rather than a nuclear device, the idea that a major nuke could go off in an American city is nothing new.
On February 9th, ABC 10News in San Diego interviewed Al Hallor about security issues at a San Diego Port. Hallor then went on to drop a bombshell, admitting that an unamed government agency had recovered a weapon of mass effect in the last year.
Since the first report and our story, “San Diego Port Officer Says Nukes Have Been Found In An American Port,” Fox News and multiple other major outlets have ran a watered down verison of the original story.
The rumors of missing nukes, illegally transported on a B-52 from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana, have lent credibilty to the fact that rogue elements within our government and the Israeli government are planning some sort of nuclear “false flag.”
In early August, Gordon Duff writing for Veterans Today warned of a possible nuclear attack which involved Israel, Pakistan and Iran.
“The National Research Council, part of the National Academy of Science, heavy on politics and light on science, announced that America was no longer able to track nukes threatening our shores. Their report titled Nuclear Forensics: A Capability at Risk, released last week, outlines the details of a secret study requested by the Departments of Homeland Security, Defense and Energy, specifically the National Nuclear Security Administration.”
Essentially the report highlighted the fact that if a nuclear bomb was detonated we would be unable to tell who made it.
“Another piece of the puzzle involved a federal task force, Defense, Energy, FBI, descending on a warehouse in Greenfield, Indiana under the guise of a “records search.” This “Waco style” assault on a facility storing furniture for college dorm rooms was much more than it seemed. No case, criminal or civil, provided any underlying reason for the search,” wrote Duff.
Listen to our early August interview with Gordon Duff here.
Similar to the months leading up to 9/11, the public is being conditioned to accept the fact that a nuclear or biological weapon of mass destruction WILL go off in an American city in the very near future. This is absolutely unacceptable considering Homeland Security is installing a police state throughout America yet somehow cannot stop cave dwelling ninjas?
Filed Under Afghanistan, Anti-War, Big Brother, CIA, Censorship, Documentary, Evidence, Global Awakening, Iraq, Israel, Mainstream Media, Media reporting, Military Industrial Complex, Mossad, New World Order, Operation Mockingbird, Pentagon, YouTube, cointelpro | Comments Off
By Saman Mohammadi (about the author)
Former PBS broadcaster Bill Moyers, with all his influence and prestige, publicly derided 9/11 truth activists, and supported the official myth in a speech he gave in New York on January 27, 2011.
Become a Fan (11 fans)
Of all people, Moyers should know the power of myths in human society, and that a myth is not the truth. “Myths are public dreams,” said Joseph Campbell. In America, where tricksters and thieves have total government power in their hands, and rule over the public mind with propaganda and other techniques of collective brainwashing, the only truth that is allowed to be expressed is their truth. What they say is real becomes reality itself; what they dream behind closed doors becomes lived experience. They did 9/11, and they’re still free almost ten years later because journalists have not fully questioned the events of that day. Since 9/11 the American people, and people across the planet, have lived not in a public dream but in a public nightmare. And we have the tricksters and traitors in Washington to thank.
It takes patience, and a “readiness to own thyself mistaken,” as Thomas Carlyle said, to dig through the facts and evidence before arriving at the truth of what really happened on September 11, 2001. I thought Moyers would be more open-minded and sympathetic, but he’s made an ignorant judgment about the movement for 9/11 truth and accountability. I feel let down because I admired Moyers. It turns out most journalists can’t handle the truth about 9/11. Oh well. I have new heroes now: Paul Craig Roberts, William Cooper, David Ray Griffin, Alex Jones, Richard Gage, Bob McIlvaine, the list is endless. I hope Moyers rejoins the list in the future.
Although I understand that people deny a painful truth because it undermines their core beliefs about the world, and damages their self-esteem, I’m still surprised that intelligent and genuinely independent-minded individuals can’t accept the fact that the Bush administration completely lied about 9/11. Our supposedly best journalists and reporters, who constantly talk about democracy, free speech, and the need to resist power, and who endlessly quote Orwell, are not only nowhere to be found when it comes to speaking the truth about 9/11, but they arrogantly mock the individuals who are simply asking for a new investigation.
Like other prominent journalists and reporters, Chris Hedges and Robert Parry among them, former PBS broadcaster Bill Moyers is shockingly dismissive of the evidence that undercuts the official story about 9/11 which has been painstakingly gathered by 9/11 truth activists, professional architects and engineers, citizen journalists, and regular individuals.
In a speech given at a convention held by History Makers in New York on January 27, 2011, Moyers said that the 9/11 truth movement is not based on the truth but disinformation and conspiracy theories. He ignorantly refers to 9/11 truth activists as “truthers.” Here is an excerpt from the speech:
Disinformation is not unique to the right, of course. Like other journalists, I have been the object of malevolent assaults from the “9/11 truthers” for not reporting their airtight case proving that the Bush administration conspired to bring about the attacks on the World Trade Center. How did they discover this conspiracy? As the independent journalist Robert Parry has written, “the truthers” threw out all the evidence of al-Qaeda’s involvement, from contemporaneous calls from hijack victims on the planes to confessions from al-Qaeda leaders both in and out of captivity that they had indeed done it. Then, recycling some of the right’s sophistry techniques, such as using long lists of supposed evidence to overcome the lack of any real evidence, the “truthers” cherry-picked a few supposed “anomalies” to build an “inside-job” story line. Fortunately, this Big Lie never took hold in the public mind. These truthers on the left, if that is where GPS can find them on the political map, are outgunned, outmatched and outshouted by the media apparatus on the right that pounds the public like drone missiles loaded with conspiracy theories and disinformation and accompanied by armadas of outright lies.
George Orwell had warned six decades ago that the corrosion of language goes hand in hand with the corruption of democracy. If he were around today, he would remind us that “like the rattling of a stick inside a swill bucket,” this kind of propaganda engenders a “protective stupidity” almost impossible for facts to penetrate.
But you, my colleagues, can’t give up. If you do, there’s no chance any public memory of everyday truths - the tangible, touchable, palpable realities so vital to democracy - will survive. We would be left to the mercy of the agitated amnesiacs who “make” their own reality, as one of them boasted at the time America invaded Iraq, in order to maintain their hold on the public mind and the levers of power. You will remember that in Orwell’s novel “1984,” Big Brother banishes history to the memory hole, where inconvenient facts simply disappear. Control of the present rests on obliteration of the past. The figure of O’Brien, who is the personification of Big Brother, says to the protagonist, Winston Smith: “We shall squeeze you empty and then we shall fill you with ourselves.” And they do. The bureaucrats in the Ministry of Truth destroy the records of the past and publish new versions. These in turn are superseded by yet more revisions. Why? Because people without memory are at the mercy of the powers that be; there is nothing against which to measure what they are told today. History is obliterated.
By quoting Orwell, you would think that Moyers would understand that using the labels “conspiracy theories” and “9/11 truthers” to bat away and delegitimize other human beings represents “the corrosion of language” that Orwell warned about. How did the label “conspiracy theory” enter the popular lexicon in the first place, anyway? It surely benefits the war criminals in power in Washington when journalists like Moyers and Parry use the label “conspiracy theorist” to put down activists and stand beside the official lie that Al-Qaeda and Osama Bin Laden carried out the 9/11 attacks. It seems like Moyers, Parry, and other journalists are putting themselves inside a bubble of “protective stupidity,” making it “almost impossible for facts to penetrate.”
Has Moyers watched the collapse of Building 7? Has he read the books on 9/11 by David Ray Griffin? Has he interviewed Richard Gage of Architects And Engineers For 9/11 Truth? What kind of research has he done on the subject? Or is he just talking out of his ass?
If Orwell were alive today, he would not mock 9/11 truth, but research all the evidence, and then let it all hang out.
Saman “Truth Excavator” Mohammadi is a blogger and a full-time university student, currently living in Toronto, Canada. His blog is The Excavator - http://disquietreservations.blogspot.com
Why the Fuss? The Call to Arms against UN Rapporteur Richard Falk for Alluding to Gaps in the 9/11 Official Story
Filed Under 9-11 Commission, 9-11 truth, Al Qaeda, Architects and Engineers, CIA, Censorship, David Ray Griffin, Evidence, Global Awakening, Independent Media, International, Mainstream Media, Medical Professionals for 911 Truth, Political Leaders for 9-11 Truth, Politicians speak out, U.N. | Comments Off
by Elizabeth Woodworth
January 28, 2011
A former Princeton international law professor has been condemned by the UN Secretary General and the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations for alluding to “an apparent cover-up” of the events of September 11th, 2001.
On January 11, 2011, UN Special Envoy to Palestine Richard Falk posted on his personal blog an article entitled “Interrogating the Arizona Killings from a Safe Distance.”
Dr. Falk made a tangential point in his blog-post that governments too often abuse their authority by treating “awkward knowledge as a matter of state secrets”.
To illustrate the point, he referred to gaps and contradictions in the official account of the 9/11 attacks, which have been documented in the scholarly works of Dr. David Ray Griffin, a professor emeritus of philosophy of religion and theology.
“What seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred,” wrote Falk.
On January 20th, executive director Hillel Neuer of UN Watch, a European NGO, called upon UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to condemn the remarks made by Falk, and to fire him, claiming that Falk had “endorsed the conspiracy theory that the 9/11 terrorist attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. government and not Al Qaeda terrorists.” 
On January 24th, in a reply to Hillel Neuer, Vijay Nambiar, Ban Ki-moon’s Chief of Staff, responded that the Secretary-General “condemns these remarks. He has repeatedly stated his view that any such suggestion is preposterous — and an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack.”
The US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, called for Falk’s removal, stating that “Mr. Falk’s comments are despicable and deeply offensive, and I condemn them in the strongest terms.” 
Surely, in light of what Falk actually said, these indignant cries on behalf of the victims seem more than a little apoplectic.
If Falk’s suggestions were so “preposterous” and “offensive”, they might have been dismissed as the ravings of a madman.
So why did officials bring out their cannons to shoot at a sparrow?
Well, turning to the work of Professor Griffin we find that there were 115 omissions and distortions in the 9/11 Commission Report, though Falk did not, in his brief remarks, provide details. 
A search of the Internet reveals 12 professional organizations calling for a new investigation, including Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth (with over 1,400 professional members), Firefighters for 9/11 Truth, Intelligence Officers for 9/11 Truth, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, Medical Professionals for 9/11 Truth, Pilots for 9/11 Truth, Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth, Military Officers for 9/11 Truth, and Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
In August, 2005, the New York Times printed the oral testimonies of 118 firefighters and emergency workers who reported stunning, graphic evidence of enormous explosions, including mysterious blasts in the deep sub-basements of the buildings long before the towers fell.
More recently, a nine-author peer-reviewed study, which showed that the World Trade Center dust appeared to contain residue of explosive material (nanothermite), made headlines for the first week of February 2010 in major Danish newspapers. 
This news never reached the North American media.
A December 2010 poll by the prestigious Emnid Institute showed that 89.5% of Germans doubt the US official story about the September 11th attacks.
The 9/11 commissioners themselves, in a 2008 op-ed piece to the New York Times, bemoaned the withholding of witness evidence to the 9/11 Commission by the CIA: “What we do know is that government officials decided not to inform a lawfully constituted body, created by Congress and the president, to investigate one the greatest tragedies to confront this country. We call that obstruction.” 
Perhaps this sparrow is worth a cannon or two.
In other words, was Falk attacked so strongly to try to make people fear suggesting in public even the possibility that the official story is problematic?
A friend just told me about this, as she said, “Are the birds getting bigger?“ 200 cows were found dead in a Wisconsin field yesterday. This is cow country so where is the big-headline-media scare?!?
The owner or the cows’ veterinarian said he suspects the cause may be IBR/BVD virus. Authorities say there is no threat to humans or other animals. I don’t know if I can agree given all the other mass animal deaths recently. I guess this is another one of those “look-away-folks, nothing-to-see-here-folks, move-along-now-folks” explanations. DHS is usually changing warning color charts and waving the fear-factor flag on news like this. Their silence is deafening! One suspected case of cow-something like this usually gets major air-time and every letter of the gov alphabet is on alert. 200 large animals dropped dead w/o warning it seems… they were found in a field. If one cow was sick they would separate it from the rest. So if it’s a virus, it appears to be fast moving… more reason to make the headlines. The same theory for the other mass animal deaths could apply here too.
I’m sorry to say we can add another 300 birds to the body count in Alabama and add Turkey to the list of countries because they just reported dozens of dead birds in the northwest province of Bursa. I wonder how many flocks of birds and schools of fish have not been found. There has been no logical explanation by officials and their silence is deafening! I can not shake the scientists in Italy; all of the turtle doves had blue tinged beaks and that would indicate poison or hypoxia. Nor can I forget the timing and murder of biological warfare expert, John Wheeler. USAF called chemtrails a hoax and I call it fraud and deception.
Air, soil, food and water are our most basic needs and chemicals sprayed from jets adversely affect them all. This is an attack on every source of life and it is dead wrong whatever reason the government will soon be forced to explain. It must be stopped! Each of these purveyors of destruction must be removed from office and they must be punished. Business is dependent upon supply and demand; government is supplying the chemical attack but the demander must also be stopped and brought to justice. Former FBI Chief, Ted Gunderson says he has seen the planes they use to spray this crap sitting at the Air National Guard in Lincoln, Nebraska.The heaviest spraying around my city concentrates in the most populated area and comes on days when people are outside (weekends, holidays and ballgames). It seems the city-people are the target. Could there be another reason? Monsanto is the Microsoft of GMO seed; they supply about 90% of genetically modified seeds so I think it’s a good place to look for a motive. Monsanto and government are partners in research for genetically altered seeds and I believe they are partners in chemtrails also. Please see “Monsanto buys ‘Terminator’ Seeds Company” and “Delta and Pine Land Company”.I noticed something unexpected when I watched a documentary on Monsanto, GMOs and farms, ‘The Future of Food’(2004). The first time I watched the film [having chemtrail awareness] I saw a tie between Monsanto and chemtrails. Rodney Nelson, a farmer in Amenia, North Dakota begins to tell his story about his Monsanto encounter. Monsanto sued him in 2000 just as they have been suing many farmers. The film shows the farmer working in the field and the sky is coated with chemtrails. The many trails are too high for crop dusting and too low for contrails. This farmer was sued by Monsanto and apparently attacked with chemicals sprayed from government planes. I doubt the farmer realized the chemtrails and it is not mentioned in the film (it’s a film about GMOs, not chemtrails). Maybe it was just a fluke but I do not believe in coincidences when it comes to Monsanto. Although I think cities are targets, it appears they give Monsanto the added deed of destructing the food.
Chemtrails have been linked to contaminated air and soil, as well as many illnesses; see the article ‘Symptoms Resulting from Chemtrail Spraying’. I just read it and I can honestly say each of my health problems are found in the list of partial symptoms (I checked off more than half of the 15 categories). I’ve had several years of suffering and not much explanation from the medical field. Based on the countless medical tests I’ve had and the degree of problems, doctors agree I am ill but they have never agreed on any cause but poisoning has been named. I hope this article is read by every medical professional in each of the nations sprayed with destruction.
The “Food Safety Act” was a pointless attack on small farms and their demise will benefit those like Monsanto. The Tester Amendment was added after a hard battle, it did lessen the blow but small farms are not exempt from the regulations if they ship out of state or over 275 miles. The FDA has never traced a food-borne illness to a small farm so they should be completely exempt; we can help if we buy from small local farms (Think Global Act Local).
Corporations control much of the food supply and just like Henry Kissinger said, “Control the food and you control the people”. Corporations are calling the shots in government moreover with each passing law and/or appointment. Obama appointed lobbyist Michael Taylor as senior advisor for FDA Commission on food safety. Michael Taylor was Monsanto’s VP for Public Policy (1998 until 2001). There is a video and an article below that exemplify the danger Monsanto has had on India’s farmers.
Destructive companies like BP et al and protected by the government that is supposed to work for ‘We the People’. The Gulf oil gusher was the worst environmental disaster in US history yet it was never declared disaster by Obama [impact on claimants is big tax debt]. Maybe Obama should appoint Wayward-Hayward to the EPA. Monsanto has the support of government at the expense of a healthy environment for air, food, soil, water and people. Obama’s appointments have only strengthened this control by corporations. We the People are not a priority for GOV Inc., whether by direct or indirect efforts, we are a target.
I have to agree with Germany’s High Court ruling against Monsanto on the GMO issue. As reported, “GE alters the very structure of life that could have irreversible effects. Therefore, the high level of precaution surrounding the cultivation and the commercialization of GMO products is perfectly legitimate.” It is uncertain how our High Court would rule in a case such as Germany’s but I do not have much faith it would be similar. Supreme Court Justice Thomas worked for Monsanto in the 1970s. He also wrote the majority opinion that ruled “newly developed plant breeds are patentable” which companies like Monsanto’s benefit – just another fluke I suppose.
India was Monsanto’s testing ground for genetically modified farming. It failed miserably for the farmers and crops. Monsanto’s altered seeds can not be saved and planted the following year because of their genetic alterations. The prices rose dramatically and the sterilization meant growers must buy more seeds every year. This has been referred to as a “suicide seed”. The reason may come from the fact that over 182,900 Indian farmers committed suicide between 1997 and 2007 (National Crime Records Bureau of India). That estimates to 46 suicides every day or 2 every hour and that happened in Taylor’s time at Monsanto. Obama’s appointed food safety czar in 2009. There are other public officials that previously worked for Monsanto.
Monsanto spent $8.8 million on lobbying in 2008 and $2 million in the first quarter of 2009 (near the birth of HR875 Food Safety Bill) but only $6.1 million total in 2009. It is only a $3 million difference in lobbying dollars that occurred the same year Monsanto would have a former VP appointed to the FDA Commission so maybe it is just another fluke. JP Morgan’s William Daley is Obama’s newly appointed Chief of Staff but I am talking food now so I’ll avoid such nauseating thoughts about our banking woes.
There are many other corporations suspected to be involved in this destruction of our planet. It must take an enormous group effort and insanely high cost to pull off a ‘chemical attack’ of this magnitude. One can only imagine the requirements of research, production and delivery systems. But with the military spraying us and all the tax-favors given to corporations, I suppose you could say we are funding the chemical attack on us. Based on what appears to be the object of spraying, air, soil, food and water… all things we rely upon, maybe the object truly is our destruction. Again, I can’t answer why someone would do these things but the evidence shows it is happening. The expression ‘it takes one to know one’ most definitely applies. I am a “peace loving, nature caring, people doting, devoted parent and fond of life” human being. The Native Americans had it perfectly balanced; respect nature and the land and it will provide every need. People that allow these crimes against humanity and nature are far removed from balanced.
The science is finally catching up to this problem and the evidence mounts; 2010 was a very eventful year in exposing Chemtrails (‘Case Orange’, ‘Rosalind Peterson’ and ‘What in the World are they Spraying?”). The mass animal deaths have people looking up and asking the same question, why? I am sticking by my theory; please read if you haven’t already (see post 01/07/11). My ears are ringing but I also hear lyrics similar to The Carpenters song ‘Close to You’. This is from Chemical-free; Why do birds fall down from the sky, every time jets fly by? Just like me, they long to be chemical-free. I have written the lyrics for a song but I can’t sing worth a damn.
There is a UN Resolution against genocide, and this attack clearly falls under that Resolution but the UN Nations have yet to step up. I applaud Corinne Spence and Gary Richard Arnold for their efforts to put forth new legislation aimed directly at the aerosol attacks. Corrine delivered a draft of the proposed legislation “The Planetary Population and Atmospheric Purity Act” to Congressman Ron Paul and many other groups in various countries. Dr. Ron Paul would be remiss to ignore this serious problem because he has the position to expose this dirty government secret. I understand how hard it is to believe this is happening but we must all rise above the ‘Normalcy Bias’ (see post w/same title). Not only would the spraying end, it would be refreshing to trust in government officials again.
UN Resolution may someday be enforced for this genocide but in the mean time, Read more
Jesse Ventura’s CONSPIRACY THEORY show does a heroic job in one of the best exposés of all the inconsistencies and blaring lies regarding the Pentagon explosion on 9-11. Thank you Jesse Ventura. Please everyone TiVo or DVR his show every week. Let’s throw our support behind his show.
full episode >
On November 13, Bob McIlvaine and Tony Szamboti appeared on Geraldo Rivera’s show “Geraldo At Large” on Fox News to talk about the “BuildingWhat?” TV ad campaign.keep looking »