Donate

Archive for the Federal Reserve Category

On the Fourth of July 1776,

the American states were united at war with Great Britain and had just declared their Independance.  But what did it mean?  What does it mean now? - Independence.  This nation acted like one of England’s colonies for hundreds of years and in that time had grown to become one of Great Britain’s most productive resources.  Then the French American War began and England came to defend the “colonists” incurring great debts and finally winning the war.  Britain decided that it needed to keep troops here even though it did not have sufficient forts and that it could not afford to build such forts; therefore they decided to compel the people here to quarter the British troops in their homes with room and board; for protection of such troops they confiscated the peoples guns; the King also created a sales tax.  The rights of the colonists became so abused that it became necessary to stand against Great Britain’s abuse over, “the last straw” — though most of the sales taxes were dropped, on a few key imported items like tea and shugar they went from from 3% to 6%.  In response, rather than paying the increased tax, some of the colonists had a party (the Boston Tea Party) and threw a load of tea into the harbor;  while others formed the Declaration of Independence and went to war.

When the War was over they formed a new foundational document, The Articles of Confederation, that document recognized this nation as a nation made up of independent sovereign United States, and gave the name “The United States of America” to the new government.  Many of the people of this new nation felt that it was wrong to leave England.  Sure there were rights violations but those were livable and their future was a certainty as an English Colony.  Now that they were on their own nothing at all was sure.

Over the next ten years conditions in this country continually got worse.  The individual States gave little regard to any other State and paid nearly no attention at all to the central government.  After ten years of independence from Great Britain conditions were far worse than they had ever been under Great Britain’s rule and protection.  Many wanted government officials to go back to Great Britain and beg the King to take us back, and they almost did.

“To form a more perfect Union”

That movement was considered too severe to take without first attempting to resolve the problems of this new nation by the sitting of what later became known as the Constitutional Convention.  Each of the Sovereign States gave authority to (deputized) a few men to form a college to review and reform the present form of government and to eliminate the errors made in thier first attempt at the Articles of Confederation.  In other words those few men were collectively entrusted with the peoples’ sovereign authority to reform the government.  The Deputies created a Trust Indenture.  Though some people say the Indenture had no title, because there was no Title written in bold letters at its head, its title, “The Constitution for the United States of America”, was given in its Preamble: “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquillity, provide for the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”It containes VII Articles, concluding with the signatures of the twelve States’ Deputies present at the convention.  Once agreed to on, September 17th, 1787 and signed by the Deputies, the Trust was formed. This Indenture, (Constitution) with the intent and authority of the sovereign people, created a “Constitutional Republic” form of government in trust.  Though the Deputies were empowered to reform the government to more perfectly align it with the will of the people, the States had not fully expected that their sovereignty and control over the land would be removed, wherefore the Deputies resolved to take the Trust back to the individual States for their respective ratification.  The States conditionally refused ratification until limits were placed upon the new government that would secure man’s God given inherent rights.

Remember, under the Articles of Confederation, these individual States were recognized as individually Sovereign States, which was the problem with the Articles of Confederation, there was no accountability or control over the individual States.  Without accountability whoever was in power simply ignored the central government and moved forward literally however they saw fit (in violation of individual rights, or not).  In essence, they were each absolutely powerful kingdoms.  It was obvious that if something wasn’t done to unite the Union of States as, “United States” they would be destroyed from within or without.  So when offered the Trust Indenture, the individual sovereign States’ leaders could see that they would no longer be sovereign if they accepted the Trust, and they would be destroyed if they didn’t accept it.

Not much of a choice, but the war with England ended only a little over ten years earlier and they didn’t want to go back, so they demanded that if they were to give up their sovereignty, the people’s rights must be preserved from the central government. Thus they conditionally refused the Trust until the insisted on “Bill of Rights” were added. Therefore, the Trust document was first created to create a Trust known as the “United States”. The Trust created a government controlled by the Trust. Government officials were set up within the Trust as Trustees with specific defined responsibilities and functions. The People were set up as the beneficiaries of the Trust and when any government official takes office he/she is required to swear an oath of allegiance [make a contract with the people to uphold the Constitution]. Remember, at this point the government has already been created in trust, by the signed Constitution.

As yet the Trust has nobody sitting in the offices of government, however, the States are not willing to support the Trust and authorize its officers to function with control over them unless the people’s rights and the State’s rights are secured. The Conventioneers went back to work to draft the requested, Bill of Rights, which were later provided as the First Ten Amendments to the, Constitution of the United States of America, a document that was created to bind officers in an Oath to uphold the Trust of the people and securing the peoples rights.

Then the Trust, the Constitution for the United States of America (still signed and unchanged from its original version as first presented to the states), along with the “Bill of Rights” as the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, were returned to the individual States and were ratified by each of those States and returned to the Constitutional Convention where the new government was made effective and put in operation on or after, December 15th, 1791, the “Effective date of the Constitution which was then rewritten with the Title, The Constitution of the United States of America, including the Bill of Rights.

Now let’s go back and again review the documents created in the process by name. (Names are about to become (more…)

Cassandra Anderson

Infowars.com

May 7, 2010

The ‘Audit the Fed’ bill has been watered down by Senator Bernard Sanders right at the last minute (a common strategy: pretend to be a populist, then at the last minute, the politician “gives in” in the spirit of compromise). The Audit the Fed bill could go to vote in the Senate any day now.


Obama opposed the bill, until the rewrite. One can only imagine what type of pressure his administration applied to the Senate.

Bernanke opposed the bill, and even said that an audit of the Fed’s monetary policy could “seriously threaten” the Fed’s independence. This statement couldn’t be more true. The Fed is not bound in any way to transparency and informing the American people how much money the Fed is printing or to whom it is being given, however, the American taxpayers are on the hook for the debt. The Federal Reserve opposes an audit of its monetary policy (what the plans are for the economy and the means by which it will be carried out) because then it would appear in print and the criminal nature of the Fed would become apparent.

The Federal Reserve is a cartel: an agreement between parties to refrain from competition in a true free market, thus creating a monopoly that has extended into an oligarchy (the rule over the masses by a few). The bankers created the bubble that caused the debt, have prolonged recovery by keeping interest rates low and monetizing the debt. Obama’s Financial Reform Bill will create perpetual bailouts for the bankers. Bailouts are not anything new, in the past, many large entities like Amtrak, New York City and Chrysler have been bailed out by the taxpayer, the difference now is that it is moving at a breakneck pace. The bankers control the economy and have overwhelming influence over Congress and government.

Unless the Audit the Fed bill passes in its original form, with the full audit conducted by the Government Accounting Office (GAO), it would be unlikely that the American taxpayers would actually find out which banks received the bailout money, how much money and under what conditions. G. Edward Griffin, author of the classic book, ‘The Creature From Jekyll Island’ pointed out that an audit (that lacks GAO direction) would only result in a whitewash- the appointed auditors would likely be a commission comprised of friends of the Fed, it would be narrow and superficial. It would give the impression something was being done,and after a long time, theaudit report would be cover-up, assuring the people that everything was fine. An example of this is the 9/11 “Omission Report” that completely neglected the most damning evidence: Building 7.

Having said that, the ‘Audit the Fed’ bill is important, in its original form, because it is has alerted the (more…)

>
Watch on YouTube

>

Watch on YouTube

>

Watch on YouTube

by Jonathan Markowitz

Michelle Goldberg was Ian Masters’ first guest on the second hour of Background Briefing today on KPFK (Sunday, Oct 19, 2009: go to: http://www.kpfk.org/index.php , click on “Audio Archives”).

This segment was dedicated to bashing conspiracy theories of nearly every kind, including 9/11 truth, chemtrails, the mandatory flu vaccine operation & martial law readiness, globalism, with the target focus of the guest’s recent piece in The New Republic being Alex Jones, “one of the country’s most significant purveyors of paranoia”.

And it goes on from there with special mention of Jones being executive producer of the most recent version of Loose Change. Unlike Naomi Wolf, who’s essentially disappeared from sight after slam dunking the 9/11 truth movement in her Guatemalan Times editorial, it seems Michelle Goldberg and her intellectually-challenged yellow journalism is the latest “liberated” female (pseudo) deep thinker to be fronted by the state controlled media machine…and of course, the New Pacifica Radio with Ian Masters front and center (soon to be launched to Pacifica national must carry status over its five stations if we don’t prevent it).

There are some in the liberal/”progressive” political communities as well as the 9/11 truth movement and who may be glad to hear Ian and his guest characterize Alex Jones as presented on KPFK today. One may not agree with every issue Jones (and others in the truth movement) expouse on the internet, I am appalled but not surprised to hear the scurilous inuendo being presented as “journalism” by Ian Masters’ and the current brainless (and posibly unwitting?) schill for government disinformation, Michelle Goldberg. This interview MUST be heard by 9/11 truth advocates and those spearheading the reisistance to the US government’s and WHO’s plan to mandatorily vaccinate all persons in the US, Canada, Mexico and other countries.

Following Goldberg, Ian inteviews Les Leopold, “The Looting of America” which is worth hearing especially in that much of the inuendo presented with the previous guest is then contradicted by Ian’s appearing to validate his guest in populist progressive spin regarding the wholesale corruption of the US financial kleptocracy on Wall Street, while the Democrats do virtually nothing. Ian keeps wondering out loud when are the people going to throw out these robbers.

To listen to the archived show of today’s Background Briefing, go to:
http://www.kpfk.org/index.php
Click on Audio Archives and then Download (to your audio files folder) Background Briefing,
October, 18, 2009, 11 am. Scroll to the second hour to hear Ian’s interview of Goldberg.

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/truther-consequences
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Goldberg
http://www.meansofreproduction.com/
http://www.kingdomcoming.com/

>Watch on YouTube

Richard Belzer on Real Time with Bill Maher exposing the Federal Reserve plot to destroy the country and their roll in the assassination of JFK. Kennedy was assassinated on Nov 22nd, which is the anniversary of the day the Federal Reserve Act was composed on Jeckyll Island in 1910.

Part 1

>

Part 2